News

Keep updated with the latest from us.
Case brief: Gaming Machine Association of New Zealand Inc v Feed Families Not Pokies Aotearoa Inc [2025] NZCA 16
May 28, 2025
The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s declaration that a non-statutory process that allowed pokie machine operators to relocate was unlawful under the Gambling Act 2003.
Case Brief: Kamal v Restructuring Insolvency and Turnaround Association of New Zealand Inc [2021] NZCA 514
May 19, 2025
The Restructuring Insolvency and Turnaround Association of New Zealand (“RITANZ”) declined Mr Kamal’s application for membership on character grounds. The High Court dismissed his application to quash that decision, but issued a declaratory judgement in his favour. The Court of Appeal upheld RITANZ’s decision to decline his membership application and allowed a cross-appeal by RITANZ against the declaratory judgement, which relaxed the procedural standards the High Court set for RITANZ when determining applications.
Case Brief: Seafood New Zealand v Royal Forest & Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Inc [2024] NZSC 111
May 7, 2025
The Supreme Court overturned the Minister for Oceans and Fisheries’ decision on Total Allowable Catch (“TAC”) for the East Coast tarakihi fishery (“East Coast Fishery”), despite Seafood New Zealand succeeding on one ground of appeal. The key issues were whether the Minister’s decision could consider social, cultural, and economic factors (“SCE factors”), and what probability of rebuild success the Minister could choose.
Case brief: Bank of New Zealand v Christian Church Community Trust [2024] NZCA 645
May 1, 2025
The Court of Appeal overturned an injunction, allowing a bank to close a client's account due to human rights abuse concerns, ruling there was no arguable case that the account closure breached the client’s rights.
Case Brief: Students For Climate Solutions Incorporated v Minister of Energy and Resources [2024] NZCA 152
April 3, 2025
A climate change advocacy group was unsuccessful in judicial review proceedings challenging the grant of two petroleum exploration permits.
Case Brief: Alt New Zealand Limited v Attorney-General [2023] NZHC 3855
March 26, 2025
Three vaping related businesses were unsuccessful in challenging regulations setting the maximum permissible nicotine concentration in vaping products.
Case brief: BMN vs Stonewood Group Limited
March 26, 2025
The Human Rights Review Tribunal awarded $60,000 in damages for a privacy breach, in which an employer took an employee’s work laptop, personal cell phone and a personal USB drive, without consent.
Case Brief: Hart v Marlborough District Council [2025] NZHC 47
March 11, 2025
The High Court confirmed local authorities do not carry the Crown’s Treaty duties, other than where specifically statutorily prescribed. The judicial review application by trustees of Te Rūnanga a Rangitāne o Wairau Trust, the legal representative of the Rangitāne o Wairau iwi (“Rangitāne”), as against the Marlborough District Council (“MDC”), was dismissed.
Statement regarding letter sent on behalf of Inflection Point NZ
February 26, 2025
Franks Ogilvie has become aware of a political action campaign against Franks Ogilvie and Director Stephen Franks following a letter sent on behalf of a firm client, Inflection Point NZ.

Give the team a call

We’re likely to know who makes the decisions, why, and how politics or the law can compel you or trip you up.
If it takes less than 20 minutes we rarely charge.
There are not many specialist public lawyers. Even fewer have commercial experience. We start and end with commercial interests at heart.

Contact Us

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Contact information
Level 5
Wakefield House
90 The Terrace
Wellington 6011
PO Box 10388
The Terrace
Wellington 6143
Main: +64 4 815 8050
Email: info@franksogilvie.co.nz